In the last few posts, I’ve been sharing my confusing art issue and silly pictures. I’m clearer now so here’s the issue in a few words (you’re on your own with the pictures): Why/how is it problematic to use an artist’s life to evaluate his/her work?
If you ask: “where did that question come from?” I will tell you:
Des Moines Art Center docent class instructor. In 2002, we were forbidden (that’s how strong I heard it) to judge art work by the artists’ life.
Sometimes, I fail to recognize “an infusion of simplicity”* that slips over me manifesting itself in how I receive instruction.
“An infusion of simplicity” makes it possible to see things in black and white. It flattens out layers. It is not an infusion I recommend.
Deciding to further investigate what I remembered from class, I found a working email address for the instructor and wrote her asking for clarification.
In the meantime, while reading Art Objects: Essays on Ecstasy and Effrontery** by Jeanette Winterson, I had an epiphany!
Winterson suggests when an artist creates art, he/she creates it in a separate reality. The “art” is then a reflection of the separate reality – not of the artist’s life. Does this make sense to you?
Late breaking news: I received an answer from the instructor – a delightful message that I will share next numbered post – probably not midweek. I want to get her permission to share her name and that may take time.
And we have lots of time. Please be sure and share your thoughts on any and all issues we discuss. It’s how I learn.
Thanks for exploring the mystery – Nicky Mendenhall
*Thanks to Ann and Barry Ulanov for the phrase an “infusion of simplicity” found in Religion and the Unconscious (1975), page 38.
**Isn’t that a delightful title? 1995.